<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Techie Xplorer &#187; Hardware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/category/hardware/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techiexplorer.com</link>
	<description>Xploring Gadgets, Computing and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:17:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>AMD-branded memory to reach US shores</title>
		<link>http://www.techiexplorer.com/2011/11/amd-branded-memory-to-reach-us-shores.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.techiexplorer.com/2011/11/amd-branded-memory-to-reach-us-shores.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 07:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sylv3rblade</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DDR3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techiexplorer.com/?p=804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Advanced Micro Devices  (AMD) has just announced that their AMD-branded memory modules will soon be shipping via strategic partners in the US.</p>
<p>For years even before the ATI acquisition, AMD has been supplying the memory modules for Radeon GPU&#8217;s production-line, making them a pretty big market-player in the memory industry behind the lines.  The company claims that they have used the AMD OverDrive performance optimization tool to test and optimize DRAM in conjunction with their APUs, CPUs, GPUs and chipset platforms.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/AMD-Modules.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-805" title="AMD-branded memory to reach US shores" src="http://www.techiexplorer.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/AMD-Modules-500x243.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="243" /><!--more--></a></p>
<p>For those interested in trying them out, AMD&#8217;s DDR3 memory modules will be available in 2GB, 4GB and 8GB capacities and each will be available in several variants:</p>
<p>Entertainment</p>
<ul>
<li>1333MHz</li>
<li>1600MHz</li>
</ul>
<p>Performance</p>
<ul>
<li>1600MHz in matched pairs</li>
<li>1866MHz in matched pairs</li>
</ul>
<p>The high-end performance modules are are tuned, tested and certified for specific AMD platforms.</p>
<p>No word on pricing yet but AMD&#8217;s memory DIMMs wil be available through major retails including Amazon.com, Bestbuy.ca, Fry’s, Memory Express, Micro Center, NCIX, Newegg, Tiger Direct, VIP Computers (UK) and others in the near future. s</p>
<p>source <a href="http://www.amd.com/us/press-releases/Pages/amd-memory-brand-introduced-2011nov28.aspx">AMD</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<hr noshade style="margin:0;height:1px" />
<a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/2011/11/amd-branded-memory-to-reach-us-shores.html">AMD-branded memory to reach US shores</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com">Techie Xplorer</a>©  on November 29, 2011, 7:50 am.<br />
This post is part of the category <a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/category/hardware" title="View all posts in Hardware" rel="category tag">Hardware</a>.  If you're seeing this post other on a site other than http://techiexplorer.com, please send me and email immediately: sylv3rblade@atmaxplorer.com
<p><small>Feed enhanced by <a href='http://planetozh.com/blog/my-projects/wordpress-plugin-better-feed-rss/'>Better Feed</a> from  <a href='http://planetozh.com/blog/'>Ozh</a></small></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techiexplorer.com/2011/11/amd-branded-memory-to-reach-us-shores.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nvidia to license SLI for AMD Motherboards</title>
		<link>http://www.techiexplorer.com/2011/04/nvidia-to-license-sli-for-amd-motherboards.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.techiexplorer.com/2011/04/nvidia-to-license-sli-for-amd-motherboards.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 23:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sylv3rblade</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SLI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techiexplorer.com/?p=722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/nvidia-sli-04-28-2011.jpg"><img src="http://www.techiexplorer.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/nvidia-sli-04-28-2011.jpg" alt="" title="Nvidia to license SLI for AMD Motherboards" width="200" height="193" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-736" /></a>If you built a PC today and chose AMD for your processor/platform, chances are you&#8217;ll only have the option of getting an AMD (formerly ATI) video card if you want to go multi-GPU.  Nvidia&#8217;s announcement today gives you the option of having SLI on the next generation of AMD chipsets.</p>
<p>According to Nvidia, SLI support will trickle into AMD&#8217;s chipsets starting with the 990FX, 990X, and 970, with support from top motherboard manufacturers Asus, ASRock, Gigabyte, and MSI.  Looking at the mentioned chipsets, their names that AMD hasn&#8217;t officially announced yet but rumor has it that they will be released alongside Bulldozer-based Zambezi processors—the chipmaker&#8217;s next flagship CPU family.<br />
<!--more--><br />
Nvidia&#8217;s blog post announcing the company&#8217;s decision to license AMD reads:</p>
<blockquote><p>Long term gamers probably remember that for a long time AMD offered great high-end CPUs, but in recent years, AMD&#8217;s stature as the preferred gaming CPU fell by the wayside and Intel CPUs have been the gamers&#8217; choice. For this reason, we&#8217;ve only licensed SLI for motherboards with Intel chipsets. However, we&#8217;ve been recently hearing chants of &#8220;SLI for AMD CPUs&#8221;, and figured that now is a great time to do it. After all, we want to make sure gamers can benefit from the new CPU competitive landscape and ensure they have NVIDIA SLI. </p></blockquote>
<p>To sum up, this is good news for enthusiasts and gamers looking forward to the Bulldozer-line for their next PC build.  Hopefully Nvidia can eke out something like AMD&#8217;s Hybrid Crossfire solution (integrated + discrete in Xfire) but that&#8217;s probably wishful thinking.</p>
<p>source <a href="http://blogs.nvidia.com/2011/04/you-asked-for-it-you-got-it-sli-for-amd/">Nvidia</a></p>
<hr noshade style="margin:0;height:1px" />
<a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/2011/04/nvidia-to-license-sli-for-amd-motherboards.html">Nvidia to license SLI for AMD Motherboards</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com">Techie Xplorer</a>©  on April 28, 2011, 11:31 pm.<br />
This post is part of the category <a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/category/hardware" title="View all posts in Hardware" rel="category tag">Hardware</a>.  If you're seeing this post other on a site other than http://techiexplorer.com, please send me and email immediately: sylv3rblade@atmaxplorer.com
<p><small>Feed enhanced by <a href='http://planetozh.com/blog/my-projects/wordpress-plugin-better-feed-rss/'>Better Feed</a> from  <a href='http://planetozh.com/blog/'>Ozh</a></small></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techiexplorer.com/2011/04/nvidia-to-license-sli-for-amd-motherboards.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 is the fastest single card GPU</title>
		<link>http://www.techiexplorer.com/2011/04/nvidia-geforce-gtx-590-is-the-fastest-single-card-gpu.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.techiexplorer.com/2011/04/nvidia-geforce-gtx-590-is-the-fastest-single-card-gpu.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 04:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sylv3rblade</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GeForece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GTX 590]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video card]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techiexplorer.com/?p=706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>AMD has just released it&#8217;s current flagship card, the dual GPU Radeon 6990 and it didn&#8217;t take long for Nvidia to respond with it&#8217;s own single-card, dual GPU solution.  Meet the GeForce GTX 590.</p>
<p>If the Radeon 6990 is basically two 6970 in crossfire configuration, embedded into a single chip, then the GeForce GTX 590 is basically two GeForce 580 in SLI.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/GTX590.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-707" title="NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 is the fastest single card GPU" src="http://www.techiexplorer.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/GTX590-500x229.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="229" /></a></p>
<p>The GeForce GTX 590 is clocked a bit slower than it&#8217;s single core brother the GTX 580 at just 607MHz and memory speed of just 853MHz.  However, as with the case is with AMD&#8217;s Radeon 6990, lowering the card&#8217;s clock speeds help trim down this monster&#8217;s TDP to just 365W.</p>
<p><strong>NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590</strong> specs are as follows:</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" width="570" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="126" align="center"></td>
<td width="102" align="center"><strong>GTX 590</strong></td>
<td width="100" align="center"><strong>GTX 580</strong></td>
<td width="100" align="center"><strong>GTX 570</strong></td>
<td width="100" align="center"><strong>GTX 560 Ti</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><strong>Stream Processors</strong></td>
<td align="center">2 x 512</td>
<td align="center">512</td>
<td align="center">480</td>
<td align="center">384</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><strong>Texture Address / Filtering</strong></td>
<td align="center">2 x 64/64</td>
<td align="center">64/64</td>
<td align="center">60/60</td>
<td align="center">64/64</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><strong>ROPs</strong></td>
<td align="center">2 x 48</td>
<td align="center">48</td>
<td align="center">40</td>
<td align="center">32</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><strong>Core Clock</strong></td>
<td align="center">607MHz</td>
<td align="center">772MHz</td>
<td align="center">732MHz</td>
<td align="center">822MHz</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><strong>Shader Clock</strong></td>
<td align="center">1214MHz</td>
<td align="center">1544MHz</td>
<td align="center">1464MHz</td>
<td align="center">1644MHz</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><strong>Memory Clock</strong></td>
<td align="center">853MHz (3414MHz data rate) GDDR5</td>
<td align="center">1002MHz (4008MHz data rate) GDDR5</td>
<td align="center">950MHz (3800MHz data rate) GDDR5</td>
<td align="center">1002Mhz (4008MHz data rate) GDDR5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><strong>Memory Bus Width</strong></td>
<td align="center">2 x 384-bit</td>
<td align="center">384-bit</td>
<td align="center">320-bit</td>
<td align="center">256-bit</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><strong>VRAM</strong></td>
<td align="center">2 x 1.5GB</td>
<td align="center">1.5GB</td>
<td align="center">1.25GB</td>
<td align="center">1GB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><strong>FP64</strong></td>
<td align="center">1/8 FP32</td>
<td align="center">1/8 FP32</td>
<td align="center">1/8 FP32</td>
<td align="center">1/12 FP32</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><strong>Transistor Count</strong></td>
<td align="center">2 x 3B</td>
<td align="center">3B</td>
<td align="center">3B</td>
<td align="center">1.95B</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><strong>Manufacturing Process</strong></td>
<td align="center">TSMC 40nm</td>
<td align="center">TSMC 40nm</td>
<td align="center">TSMC 40nm</td>
<td align="center">TSMC 40nm</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><strong>Price Point</strong></td>
<td align="center">$699</td>
<td align="center">$499</td>
<td align="center">$349</td>
<td align="center">$249</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Reviews:<br />
<a href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/4239/nvidias-geforce-gtx-590-duking-it-out-for-the-single-card-king">AnandTech</a><br />
<a href="http://hothardware.com/Reviews/NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-590-Dual-GF110s-One-PCB/">Hothardware</a><br />
<a href="http://en.expreview.com/2011/03/28/nvidia-geforce-gtx-590-graphics-card-review/15623.html">Expreview</a></p>
<hr noshade style="margin:0;height:1px" />
<a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/2011/04/nvidia-geforce-gtx-590-is-the-fastest-single-card-gpu.html">NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 is the fastest single card GPU</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com">Techie Xplorer</a>©  on April 1, 2011, 4:21 am.<br />
This post is part of the category <a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/category/featured" title="View all posts in Featured" rel="category tag">Featured</a>, <a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/category/hardware" title="View all posts in Hardware" rel="category tag">Hardware</a>.  If you're seeing this post other on a site other than http://techiexplorer.com, please send me and email immediately: sylv3rblade@atmaxplorer.com
<p><small>Feed enhanced by <a href='http://planetozh.com/blog/my-projects/wordpress-plugin-better-feed-rss/'>Better Feed</a> from  <a href='http://planetozh.com/blog/'>Ozh</a></small></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techiexplorer.com/2011/04/nvidia-geforce-gtx-590-is-the-fastest-single-card-gpu.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMD introduces Radeon HD 6990</title>
		<link>http://www.techiexplorer.com/2011/03/amd-introduces-radeon-hd-6990.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.techiexplorer.com/2011/03/amd-introduces-radeon-hd-6990.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 05:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sylv3rblade</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphics Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radeon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techiexplorer.com/?p=682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Move over 5970, the new king of the hill is here.  AMD&#8217;s top end card, the dual-GPU Antilles or for easier references the <strong>Radeon HD 6990</strong> has arrived.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/radeon-6990-angle-front.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-683" title="AMD introduces Radeon HD 6990 Dual GPU" src="http://www.techiexplorer.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/radeon-6990-angle-front.jpg" alt="" width="475" height="364" /></a></p>
<p>The <strong>Radeon HD 6990</strong> is clocked at 830MHz GPU frequency (@1.12v) and 1,250MHz for the memory (5.0Gbps effective data rate) and is equipped with 4GB of on-board frame buffer memory—2GB per GPU, 3072 stream processors enabled, 192 texture units, and 64 ROPs.   Added up, that&#8217;s about twice the specs of a Radeon HD 6970s (almost as the 6970 cards are clocked at 880MHz).  This dual GPU monster has a suprisingly low idle TDP of just 37W and a TDP at load of 375W (lol, it&#8217;s a monster card indeed).</p>
<p>AMD Radeon HD 6990 specs are as follows:</p>
<table border="1" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="123" align="center"></td>
<td width="103" align="center"><strong>AMD Radeon HD 6990</strong></td>
<td width="110" align="center"><strong>AMD Radeon HD 6970</strong></td>
<td width="99" align="center"><strong>AMD Radeon HD 6950</strong></td>
<td width="102" align="center"><strong>AMD Radeon HD 5970</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#eeeeee"><strong>Stream Processors</strong></td>
<td align="center">2&#215;1536</td>
<td align="center">1536</td>
<td align="center">1408</td>
<td align="center">2&#215;1600</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#eeeeee"><strong>Texture Units</strong></td>
<td align="center">2&#215;96</td>
<td align="center">96</td>
<td align="center">88</td>
<td align="center">2&#215;80</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#eeeeee"><strong>ROPs</strong></td>
<td align="center">2&#215;32</td>
<td align="center">32</td>
<td align="center">32</td>
<td align="center">2&#215;32</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#eeeeee"><strong>Core Clock</strong></td>
<td align="center">830MHz</td>
<td align="center">880MHz</td>
<td align="center">800MHz</td>
<td align="center">725MHz</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#eeeeee"><strong>Memory Clock</strong></td>
<td align="center">1.25GHz (5.0GHz data rate) GDDR5</td>
<td align="center">1.375GHz (5.5GHz data rate) GDDR5</td>
<td align="center">1.25GHz (5.0GHz data rate) GDDR5</td>
<td align="center">1.GHz (4GHz data rate) GDDR5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#eeeeee"><strong>Memory Bus Width</strong></td>
<td align="center">2x 256-bit</td>
<td align="center">256-bit</td>
<td align="center">256-bit</td>
<td align="center">2&#215;256-bit</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#eeeeee"><strong>Frame Buffer</strong></td>
<td align="center">2x2GB</td>
<td align="center">2GB</td>
<td align="center">2GB</td>
<td align="center">2x1GB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#eeeeee"><strong>FP64</strong></td>
<td align="center">1/4</td>
<td align="center">1/4</td>
<td align="center">1/4</td>
<td align="center">1/5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#eeeeee"><strong>Transistor Count</strong></td>
<td align="center">2x 2.64B</td>
<td align="center">2.64B</td>
<td align="center">2.64B</td>
<td align="center">2&#215;2.15B</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#eeeeee"><strong>Manufacturing Process</strong></td>
<td align="center">TSMC 40nm</td>
<td align="center">TSMC 40nm</td>
<td align="center">TSMC 40nm</td>
<td align="center">TSMC 40nm</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#eeeeee"><strong>Price Point</strong></td>
<td align="center">$699</td>
<td align="center">$349</td>
<td align="center">$259</td>
<td align="center">N/A</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Reviews:<br />
<a href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/4209/amds-radeon-hd-6990-the-new-single-card-king/">AnandTech</a><br />
<a href="http://hothardware.com/Reviews/AMD-Radeon-HD-6990-Review-Antilles-Has-Arrived/">Hothardware</a></p>
<hr noshade style="margin:0;height:1px" />
<a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/2011/03/amd-introduces-radeon-hd-6990.html">AMD introduces Radeon HD 6990</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com">Techie Xplorer</a>©  on March 8, 2011, 5:57 am.<br />
This post is part of the category <a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/category/hardware" title="View all posts in Hardware" rel="category tag">Hardware</a>.  If you're seeing this post other on a site other than http://techiexplorer.com, please send me and email immediately: sylv3rblade@atmaxplorer.com
<p><small>Feed enhanced by <a href='http://planetozh.com/blog/my-projects/wordpress-plugin-better-feed-rss/'>Better Feed</a> from  <a href='http://planetozh.com/blog/'>Ozh</a></small></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techiexplorer.com/2011/03/amd-introduces-radeon-hd-6990.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nvidia ships One Billionth GeForce chip</title>
		<link>http://www.techiexplorer.com/2011/01/nvidia-ships-one-billionth-geforce-chip.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.techiexplorer.com/2011/01/nvidia-ships-one-billionth-geforce-chip.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 09:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sylv3rblade</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video card]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techiexplorer.com/?p=631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/580-chip-shot.jpg"><img src="http://www.techiexplorer.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/580-chip-shot-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="Nvidia ships One Billionth GeForce chip" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-632" /></a>2011 is shaping up to be a good year for Nvidia as the company reaches the one billionth GeForce GPU milestone mark.  Note that the achievement states 1 billion GPUs shipped, not just manufactured.  </p>
<p>Who knows how many chips Nvidia currently has <img src='http://www.techiexplorer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>Nvidia sends it&#8217;s thanks to everyone of it&#8217;s customers and to it&#8217;s new partner,  Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC).</p>
<p>The company shares a few interesting facts about the size of 1 billion GPUs:</p>
<p>If you lined the chips all up in a row</p>
<p>    * They would wrap around the world more than twice<br />
    * They’d stretch across 315,000 American Football fields or 275,000 Soccer fields<br />
    * You’d need the entire population of Shanghai, China standing on each others’ shoulders to match it</p>
<p>Now if only Nvidia offered a price drop to celebrate I&#8217;ll switch in no time <img src='http://www.techiexplorer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<hr noshade style="margin:0;height:1px" />
<a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/2011/01/nvidia-ships-one-billionth-geforce-chip.html">Nvidia ships One Billionth GeForce chip</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com">Techie Xplorer</a>©  on January 15, 2011, 9:16 am.<br />
This post is part of the category <a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/category/hardware" title="View all posts in Hardware" rel="category tag">Hardware</a>.  If you're seeing this post other on a site other than http://techiexplorer.com, please send me and email immediately: sylv3rblade@atmaxplorer.com
<p><small>Feed enhanced by <a href='http://planetozh.com/blog/my-projects/wordpress-plugin-better-feed-rss/'>Better Feed</a> from  <a href='http://planetozh.com/blog/'>Ozh</a></small></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techiexplorer.com/2011/01/nvidia-ships-one-billionth-geforce-chip.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ATI unveils Radeon HD 6870 and HD 6850</title>
		<link>http://www.techiexplorer.com/2010/10/ati-unveils-radeon-hd-6870-and-hd-6850.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.techiexplorer.com/2010/10/ati-unveils-radeon-hd-6870-and-hd-6850.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 12:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sylv3rblade</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD 6850]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD 6870]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radeon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techiexplorer.com/?p=547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>ATI&#8217;s much awaited 6000-series graphics line has just been unveiled and will be available for public consumption soon.  In response, Nvidia dropped prices for it&#8217;s GTX 470 and <a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/2010/07/nvidias-200-gpu-king-geforce-gtx-460.html" target="_blank">GTX 460</a> 1GB (now just $199 wow!).</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p><a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/radeonhd6870xfx.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-557" title="ATI unveils Radeon HD 6870 and HD 6850" src="http://www.techiexplorer.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/radeonhd6870xfx-500x351.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="351" /></a></p>
<p>The Radeon HD 6850 is equipped with 960 stream processors, a 775MHz core clock and 1GB of GDDR5 memory at 1GHz while the HD 6870 with 1120 stream processors and 900MHz / 1,050 MHz clocks respectively.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re wondering ATI chose this naming scheme, the company says it&#8217;s to keep from confusing customers as they will keep the 5700-series, the Cypress chips that will be replaced by the 6800 series, in production.</p>
<p>The HD 6870 is priced at $180 and HD 6850 $240.</p>
<p>As for the reviews, hit these sites:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/3987/amds-radeon-6870-6850-renewing-competition-in-the-midrange-market">Read</a> &#8211; AnandTech<br />
<a href="http://www.guru3d.com/article/radeon-hd-6850-6870-review/">Read (1)</a>, <a href="http://www.guru3d.com/article/radeon-hd-6850-6870-crossfirex-review/">(2)</a> &#8211; Guru3D<br />
<a href="http://www.hardocp.com/article/2010/10/21/amd_radeon_hd_6870_6850_video_card_review">Read</a> &#8211; HardOCP<br />
<a href="http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/graphics/2010/10/22/ati-radeon-hd-6870-review/1">Read (1)</a>, <a href="http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/graphics/2010/10/22/ati-radeon-hd-6850-review/1">(2)</a> &#8211; Bit-tech<br />
<a href="http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=1022"> Read</a> &#8211; PC Perspective<br />
<a href="http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1445/1/">Read</a> &#8211; Legit Reviews<br />
<a href="http://techgage.com/article/amd_radeon_hd_6870_hd_6850/">Read</a> &#8211; Techgage<br />
<a href="http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/3601/amd_radeon_hd_6870_1gb_video_card/index.html">Read (1)</a>, <a href="http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/3600/sapphire_radeon_hd_6850_1gb_video_card/index.html">(2)</a> &#8211; TweakTown<br />
<a href="http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=27053">Read</a> &#8211; Hexus<br />
<a href="http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/HIS/Radeon_HD_6870/">Read (1)</a>, <a href="http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/HIS/Radeon_HD_6850/">(2)</a> &#8211; TechPowerUp<br />
<a href="http://hothardware.com/Reviews/AMD-Radeon-HD-6870--6850-GPUs-Debut/">Read</a> &#8211; HotHardware<br />
<a href="http://www.techspot.com/review/325-amd-radeon-6870/">Read</a> &#8211; TechSpot</p>
<hr noshade style="margin:0;height:1px" />
<a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/2010/10/ati-unveils-radeon-hd-6870-and-hd-6850.html">ATI unveils Radeon HD 6870 and HD 6850</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com">Techie Xplorer</a>©  on October 24, 2010, 12:59 pm.<br />
This post is part of the category <a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/category/featured" title="View all posts in Featured" rel="category tag">Featured</a>, <a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/category/hardware" title="View all posts in Hardware" rel="category tag">Hardware</a>.  If you're seeing this post other on a site other than http://techiexplorer.com, please send me and email immediately: sylv3rblade@atmaxplorer.com
<p><small>Feed enhanced by <a href='http://planetozh.com/blog/my-projects/wordpress-plugin-better-feed-rss/'>Better Feed</a> from  <a href='http://planetozh.com/blog/'>Ozh</a></small></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techiexplorer.com/2010/10/ati-unveils-radeon-hd-6870-and-hd-6850.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel slashes Chip Prices</title>
		<link>http://www.techiexplorer.com/2010/10/intel-slashes-chip-prices.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.techiexplorer.com/2010/10/intel-slashes-chip-prices.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 02:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sylv3rblade</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Processor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techiexplorer.com/?p=534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With Sandy Bridge&#8217;s release just around the corner, Intel has dropped prices on several of it&#8217;s current processor line.</p>
<p>View the pricelists after the jump.</p>
<p><!--more--><br />
<img src="http://www.techiexplorer.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Intel_2.png" alt="" width="600" height="177" /><br />
<img src="http://www.techiexplorer.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Intel_1.png" alt="" width="600" height="75" /><br />
<img src="http://www.techiexplorer.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Intel_3.png" alt="" width="600" height="107" /></p>
<p>The price of Intel Core  i3-550 has reduced to US$117 from $138, only $4 more expensive than Core  i3-530 so it be a no brainer which processor has more value <img src='http://www.techiexplorer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .  Intel has also dropped prices on it&#8217;s mobile processors, a cut which you&#8217;ll see in the months to come on newer notebooks.</p>
<p>Intel usually slashes prices whenever they are about to release a new line of processors so we can expect Sandy Bridge anytime soon.</p>
<hr noshade style="margin:0;height:1px" />
<a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/2010/10/intel-slashes-chip-prices.html">Intel slashes Chip Prices</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com">Techie Xplorer</a>©  on October 19, 2010, 2:08 am.<br />
This post is part of the category <a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/category/hardware" title="View all posts in Hardware" rel="category tag">Hardware</a>.  If you're seeing this post other on a site other than http://techiexplorer.com, please send me and email immediately: sylv3rblade@atmaxplorer.com
<p><small>Feed enhanced by <a href='http://planetozh.com/blog/my-projects/wordpress-plugin-better-feed-rss/'>Better Feed</a> from  <a href='http://planetozh.com/blog/'>Ozh</a></small></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techiexplorer.com/2010/10/intel-slashes-chip-prices.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dell Compares PCs vs Macs</title>
		<link>http://www.techiexplorer.com/2010/08/dell-compares-pcs-vs-macs.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.techiexplorer.com/2010/08/dell-compares-pcs-vs-macs.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 01:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sylv3rblade</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techiexplorer.com/?p=438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With Microsoft putting up it&#8217;s own <a href="http://thedailyblend.net/microsoft-takes-put-shots-at-apple-788.html">PC vs Mac comparison</a> (guess who wins on this one?), Dell ups the ante by erecting a similar page comparing  Apples to Apples.</p>
<p>Apples to Apples?  Huh?</p>
<p>For some reason, Dell&#8217;s marketing thinks it&#8217;s own offerings are comparable and superior to the MacBook equivalents.<br />
<!--more--><br />
The page pits Dell&#8217;s Studio 15 and 17 laptop line up against the equivalent MacBook Pro models and its desktop offerings up against the Mac Mini and  iMac.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s some of the comparisons made by Dell:</p>
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="725" valign="top"><a onclick="s_objectID=&quot;http://www.dell.com/content/topics/segtopic.aspx/apple-comparison?c=us&amp;cs=19&amp;l=en&amp;s=dhs&amp;~tab=2_1&quot;;return this.s_oc?this.s_oc(e):true" href="http://imgur.com/YCyFJ.jpg"><img style="border: 0pt none;" title="Compare and Save." src="http://imgur.com/YCyFJ.jpg" border="0" alt="Compare and Save." width="728" height="120" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="725" valign="top">
<table style="width: 725px;" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top">System</td>
<td valign="top">Studio 15</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">MacBook Pro 15</td>
<td valign="top">Studio 17</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">MacBook Pro 17<a onclick="s_objectID=&quot;javascript:void(0)_1&quot;;return this.s_oc?this.s_oc(e):true" rel="/content/public/glossary.aspx?c=us&amp;s=dhs&amp;l=en&amp;cs=19&amp;~tnmode=html&amp;i=apple_compete_1" href="javascript:void(0)"><sup>1</sup></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="5" height="5"><img src="http://i.dell.com/images/global/brand/title/shad.gif" alt="" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Processor</strong></td>
<td valign="top">Intel<sup>®</sup> Core<sup><small>TM</small></sup> i7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Intel<sup>®</sup> Core<sup><small>TM</small></sup> i7</td>
<td valign="top">Intel<sup>®</sup> Core<sup><small>TM</small></sup> i7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Intel<sup>®</sup> Core<sup><small>TM</small></sup> i5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Color</strong></td>
<td valign="top">Available in 6 colors</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Silver</td>
<td valign="top">Available in 6 colors</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Silver</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Webcam</strong></td>
<td valign="top">Built-in 2.0MP</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Built-in iSight</td>
<td valign="top">Built-in 2.0MP</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Built-in iSight</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Screen</strong></td>
<td valign="top">15.6” TrueLife<sup><small>TM</small></sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15.4” Glossy</td>
<td valign="top">17.3” TrueLife<sup><small>TM</small></sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">17” Glossy</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Memory</strong></td>
<td valign="top">4GB</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4GB</td>
<td valign="top">4GB</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4GB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Hard Drive</strong></td>
<td valign="top">500GB</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">500GB</td>
<td valign="top">500GB</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">500GB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Graphics Mem.</strong></td>
<td valign="top">1GB</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">512MB</td>
<td valign="top">1GB</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">512MB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Software</strong></td>
<td valign="top">Windows<sup>®</sup> Live Essentials</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">iLife<sup>®</sup></td>
<td valign="top">Windows<sup>®</sup> Live Essentials</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">iLife<sup>®</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Warranty</strong></td>
<td valign="top">1 Year Limited<br />
1Yr LoJack for Laptops Theft Protection</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1 Year Limited</td>
<td valign="top">1 Year Limited<br />
1Yr LoJack for Laptops Theft Protection</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1 Year Limited</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Price</strong></td>
<td valign="top">$1348.99</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">$2,199</td>
<td valign="top">$1268.99</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">$2,299</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Discount</strong></td>
<td valign="top">$399</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">$0</td>
<td valign="top">$219</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">$0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Total</strong></td>
<td valign="top">$949.99</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">$2,199</td>
<td valign="top">$1049.99</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">$2,299</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Savings:</strong></td>
<td valign="top">$1249</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top">$1249</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Dell seems to have forgotten the comparison of some of the more technical aspects, such as  battery life, size and weight, display panel type and resolution, among  other things but hey, at least the site is up so we can draw our own conclusions from it.</p>
<p><em>source  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.dell.com/content/topics/segtopic.aspx/apple-comparison?c=us&amp;cs=19&amp;l=en&amp;s=dhs">Dell&#8217;s comparison site here</a></em></p>
<hr noshade style="margin:0;height:1px" />
<a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/2010/08/dell-compares-pcs-vs-macs.html">Dell Compares PCs vs Macs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com">Techie Xplorer</a>©  on August 12, 2010, 1:37 am.<br />
This post is part of the category <a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/category/apple" title="View all posts in Apple" rel="category tag">Apple</a>, <a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/category/hardware" title="View all posts in Hardware" rel="category tag">Hardware</a>, <a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/category/notebooks" title="View all posts in Notebooks" rel="category tag">Notebooks</a>, <a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/category/windows" title="View all posts in Windows" rel="category tag">Windows</a>.  If you're seeing this post other on a site other than http://techiexplorer.com, please send me and email immediately: sylv3rblade@atmaxplorer.com
<p><small>Feed enhanced by <a href='http://planetozh.com/blog/my-projects/wordpress-plugin-better-feed-rss/'>Better Feed</a> from  <a href='http://planetozh.com/blog/'>Ozh</a></small></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techiexplorer.com/2010/08/dell-compares-pcs-vs-macs.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ATI Beats Nvidia in GPU Shipment Battle in Q2</title>
		<link>http://www.techiexplorer.com/2010/07/ati-beats-nvidia-in-gpu-shipment-battle-in-q2.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.techiexplorer.com/2010/07/ati-beats-nvidia-in-gpu-shipment-battle-in-q2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 19:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sylv3rblade</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techiexplorer.com/?p=424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>AMD is doing quite well with the GPU market thanks to ATI&#8217;s lead in DirectX 11 parts, the Radeon 5000 series.  As always, ATI&#8217;s offerings have offered the best price to performance ratio across all models of their GPU line (unless of course you include the just released Nvidia GeForce 460).<br />
<!--more--><br />
According to Mercury Research&#8217;s latest market share report for Q2 2010, AMD’s has taken the lead over Nvidia.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/ativsnvidia.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-425" title="ATI ships more GPU than NVIDIA for Q2 2010" src="http://www.techiexplorer.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/ativsnvidia.jpg" alt="" width="334" height="211" /></a></p>
<blockquote><p> For the first time in four years, AMD has taken control of the discrete graphics market from Nvidia, with 51.1% market share, up 10.4 points from Q2 2009. In that same period, Nvidia lost 10.4 points.</p>
<p>In the lucrative Desktop discrete market, AMD gained 11 points in the year, standing at 44.5% market share. This was a direct loss for Nvidia, who fell 10.9 points in the same period.</p>
<p>In the fast growing mobile discrete market, AMD gained another 2.4 points, now standing at 56.3% market share.</p></blockquote>
<p>Nvidia has 48.9 percent of the discrete market (no doubt thanks in Part to Apple&#8217;s decision to use their chipset on their MacBook and MacBook Pro products) but it&#8217;s a trend that AMD hopes to tip over.</p>
<hr noshade style="margin:0;height:1px" />
<a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/2010/07/ati-beats-nvidia-in-gpu-shipment-battle-in-q2.html">ATI Beats Nvidia in GPU Shipment Battle in Q2</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com">Techie Xplorer</a>©  on July 31, 2010, 7:59 pm.<br />
This post is part of the category <a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/category/hardware" title="View all posts in Hardware" rel="category tag">Hardware</a>.  If you're seeing this post other on a site other than http://techiexplorer.com, please send me and email immediately: sylv3rblade@atmaxplorer.com
<p><small>Feed enhanced by <a href='http://planetozh.com/blog/my-projects/wordpress-plugin-better-feed-rss/'>Better Feed</a> from  <a href='http://planetozh.com/blog/'>Ozh</a></small></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techiexplorer.com/2010/07/ati-beats-nvidia-in-gpu-shipment-battle-in-q2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sharp unveils 100GB Blu-ray Disc</title>
		<link>http://www.techiexplorer.com/2010/07/sharp-unveils-100gb-blu-ray-disc.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.techiexplorer.com/2010/07/sharp-unveils-100gb-blu-ray-disc.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 21:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sylv3rblade</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BluRay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VR-100BR1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techiexplorer.com/?p=387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Still popping DVDs?  How about a 100GB BluRay disc to replace all that?  Sharp has recently announced that it will be the first Blu-Ray disc maker to launch a recordable triple layer Blu-ray format with 100GB of storage capacity.  Thats twice the capacity of current Blu-ray discs in the market.<br />
<!--more--><br />
<a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Blu-ray_Disc.svg_.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-388" title="Sharp unveils 100GB Blu-ray Disc" src="http://www.techiexplorer.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Blu-ray_Disc.svg_.png" alt="" width="386" height="386" /></a>Sharp&#8217;s new beefy disk, the VR-100BR1 will be available in Japan on July 30 and will be using the new BDXL format specifications introduced by the Blu-ray Disc Association in April.  The BDXL format allows for a maximum 128GB of write-once capability for Blu-ray discs and can support up to 100GB of Blu-ray data in rewritable disc format.</p>
<p>BXDL&#8217;s secret lies in the addition of more recordable layers and allows for three to four recordable layers, while current 50GB Blu-ray discs have just two recordable layers.</p>
<p>By the numbers, Sharp&#8217;s VR-100BR1 can store up to 12 hours of regular digital TV broadcasts or nearly nine hours of digital satellite broadcasts.  No word on pricing or a US release date but you can bet that upon seeing that number a lot of folks have had their curiousity piqued.</p>
<p><em>source <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/201354/sharp_unveils_100gb_blu_ray_disc.html">PC World</a></em></p>
<hr noshade style="margin:0;height:1px" />
<a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/2010/07/sharp-unveils-100gb-blu-ray-disc.html">Sharp unveils 100GB Blu-ray Disc</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com">Techie Xplorer</a>©  on July 19, 2010, 9:21 pm.<br />
This post is part of the category <a href="http://www.techiexplorer.com/category/hardware" title="View all posts in Hardware" rel="category tag">Hardware</a>.  If you're seeing this post other on a site other than http://techiexplorer.com, please send me and email immediately: sylv3rblade@atmaxplorer.com
<p><small>Feed enhanced by <a href='http://planetozh.com/blog/my-projects/wordpress-plugin-better-feed-rss/'>Better Feed</a> from  <a href='http://planetozh.com/blog/'>Ozh</a></small></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techiexplorer.com/2010/07/sharp-unveils-100gb-blu-ray-disc.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

